What Would Helen Keller Do?

 

“Blindness cuts us off from things, but deafness cuts us off from people.”

Bouton: What Would Helen Keller Do?

                                                                       Helen Keller — Pictorial Press Ltd / Alamy Stock Photo

Did Helen Keller actually say this? No one knows.

She did express the idea in different ways. In one letter she wrote, “The problems of deafness are deeper and more complex, if not more important, than those of blindness. Deafness is a much worse misfortune. For it means the loss of the most vital stimulus — the sound of the voice that brings language, sets thoughts astir and keeps us in the intellectual company of man.”

Helen Keller lost her vision and her hearing when she was 19 months old, from an infection that was probably scarlet fever or meningitis. Like many toddlers at that age, she had some spoken language, which was presumably lost in the trauma of her illness.

Today Helen Keller’s parents would be offered the option of cochlear implants and speech therapy. Because she was also blind, conventional sign language would not be an option. The Deaf-Blind today use a form of sign language called fingerspelling,  or tactile sign language, which Keller herself used. She also learned to speak, although her speech was labored and difficult to follow.

Those with serious hearing loss often cite this quote. Although cochlear implants and hearing aids restore hearing, it may be to limited degree. Even with additional assistive devices and good lip-reading, a person with severe to profound hearing loss may still have trouble following speech in any but ideal circumstances. I know, because I’m one of them.

Nevertheless, I am certain that, given her blindness, Helen Keller would have embraced today’s cochlear implant technology. In a remarkable historic video, Keller speaks about the loss not of sight or hearing but fluid speech:

“It is not blindness or deafness that bring me my darkest hours. It is the acute disappointment in not being able to speak normally. Longingly I feel how much more good I may have done, if I had only acquired normal speech. But out of this sorrowful experience I understand more clearly all human striving, wanted ambitions, and infinite capacity of hope.”

When she died in 1968, at 87, the New York Times cited her many accomplishments: “she was graduated from Radcliffe; she became an artful and subtle writer; she led a vigorous life; she developed into a crusading humanitarian who espoused Socialism; and she energized movements that revolutionized help for the blind and the deaf.” She was a “symbol of the indomitable human spirit.”

It is hard to imagine that she could have “done more good” with the ability to speak. But her quotes suggest that she would have embraced the chance to hear “the sound of the voice that brings language, sets thoughts astir and keeps us in the intellectual company of man” — and to respond with speech.

Katherine Bouton is the author of “Living Better With Hearing Loss: A Guide to Health, Happiness, Love, Sex, Work, Friends … and Hearing Aids,” and a memoir, “Shouting Won’t Help: Why I — and 5o Million Other Americans — Can’t Hear You”. Both available on Amazon.com.

This essay first appeared in a slightly different form on AARP Health.

2 thoughts on “What Would Helen Keller Do?

  1. You don’t need to be able to hear and speak in order to become successful. It’s good language skills and a good command of a written language that is – in order to be able to communicate with hearing people, in my opinion – as long as there are other ways to communicate and access aural information (good quality hearing aids, cochlear implants, captioning, sign language interpreting, cued speech transliteration, lipreading, etc). Otherwise some of those 12 deaf and hard of hearing attorneys who use sign language as their primary communication would not have been admitted to the bar of the Supreme Court of USA, for example.

    Like

    • I couldn’t agree more. ASL is a sophisticated beautiful language. Unfortunately Helen Keller couldn’t use ASL because it requires vision. Fingerspelling, which she did us, is also good for communication but far more laborious. Still, look what Helen Keller accomplished with just that. Still, I think she would have liked to hear. She herself said she wished she’d been able to speak better.

      Like

Please leave a reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s